Publishing principles
Every page starts with a real player task and should answer that task before adding background. The site aims to publish original explanation and structure, not a stitched summary of other guides. Facts, methods, and observations may be researched across sources; another creator's wording, images, tables, and distinctive arrangement are not copied.
Unknown values remain unknown. A missing announcement is not proof that a feature does not exist, and a single community post is not proof of a universal result. Pages state platform, region, version, spoiler, or evidence limits when those boundaries affect the answer.
Evidence hierarchy
Sources are weighed according to the claim they need to support:
- Official: publisher, developer, storefront, platform, or patch material supporting release, availability, requirements, or stated features.
- In-game: a result checked in the current client with version and platform recorded.
- Video-clear: continuous footage that visibly demonstrates an action or result, with the creator and original link retained.
- Community-confirmed: independent community sources that agree on a bounded fact; this is never relabelled as official.
- Needs retest: a potentially useful claim that may be incomplete, outdated, or patch-sensitive.
- Editorial: an interpretation, recommendation, or presentation choice rather than a developer-issued ranking or guarantee.
When sources conflict, current official material and reproducible current-version evidence take priority. The disagreement stays visible when it cannot be resolved.
Review and status labels
Guide pages display a source-review date and an audited publication state. Published guide means the page's central promise is supported within its stated scope. Version-limited guide means the answer is useful but may depend on patch, platform, region, or incomplete first-party detail. Research draft means the evidence is not ready for normal reliance.
A review date records when the linked sources and current claim set were checked. It is not refreshed simply to make a page appear new. After a material patch, affected guidance is rechecked, qualified, moved to historical context, or removed.
AI-assisted work
AI-assisted tools may help organise source notes, compare terminology, detect inconsistencies, test page contracts, or prepare an editorial draft. They are not treated as evidence and cannot turn an unsupported statement into fact.
A human maintainer remains responsible for the publishing decision, the final wording, and corrections. Pages drawing on automation are still expected to identify who maintains the site, how the claim was produced, and why the page helps a player rather than merely targeting a search query.
Corrections and conflicts
Corrections are evaluated against the same standards as the original page. A useful report includes the page URL, disputed claim, current game version and platform, observed result, and strongest available source. Material errors are corrected promptly; version-sensitive disagreements may be labelled while verification continues.
Send reports to [email protected]. Credit, privacy, and media-removal requests use the same address and are handled separately from editorial ranking decisions.
Commercial independence
Payment, free access, sponsorship, affiliate relationships, or creator outreach cannot purchase a favourable conclusion, evidence label, or guide position. If commercial relationships are introduced, they will be disclosed near the affected content. Editorial recommendations will continue to state their evidence and limits.